YES reveals two new pictures of SECRET’s Hyosung … yet somehow I am disappoint

HyosungYESNew1

Hyosung … I am disappoint.

YES released two new pictures of SECRET‘s Hyosung wearing their lingerie (others are here), and … WHY IS SHE COVERED UP?

I’m not saying she should just get fucking naked (though I’m all for it), but she’s endorsing LINGERIE, so it seems stupid as shit to not show the actual product.

Then again, we’re talking about a country’s advertising industry where doing the intro to softcore porn/acting out an awesome horror script counts as a promo for Gillette, so who knows anything anymore?

HyosungYESNew2

42 comments

  1. That smile is so stiff :o

  2. Her boob outline looks totally photo-shopped in the first picture.

    • Agree. Was the first thing I saw.

      Then I realized that they also fucked up her face with PS. It looks like a mixture between Hyosung and Nana – although this combi doesn’t sound bad at all, it’s different from her real face.

      The teaser was nicer.

    • Also her belly button in the second photo. It just kind of fades out and looks fake.

  3. 8/10 would still bang

  4. You know what else is covered up

    Her gums

  5. They made her look old

  6. Fuck you YES for making her look like a dude

  7. for an underwear add, they sure know how to showcase their underwear……..

    Somebody needs to be fired.

  8. I knew her boobs were overrated

  9. Her smile is ugly

  10. dat smile :/ she looks like a piranha.

  11. the aliens photoshopped her upper lip to cover her giant gums. too unnatural must be half-et half-human just like the rest of us.

    • I never thought I’d miss Hyosung’s weird baby-teeth smile, but the extended upper lip thing is really frickin creepy.

  12. If you listen closely, you can hear the sound of hearts breaking and penises deflating.

  13. i prefer Ga-In’s to this. actually, i just prefer GA-In.

  14. If they want to really model some lingerie, these women need to attend the Victoria’s Secret School of Modeling, because this looks like a fucking joke. Abercrombie and Fitch show more in their ads for crying out loud.

  15. I was really waiting for some super boobs and sexay photos, those doesn’t look bigger than my B cup babies….

    Also I am the only one who see some resemblances between her phoshopped mouth and Zelo’s??

  16. I knew she never had those kind of boobies they showed before….hmph back to Ga-in

  17. Well it depends who they’re target market is,and i know it sounds like a stupid thing to say. If you look at Victoria Secret you know they’re target market isnt women but men,because really in real life no woman really wants to wear that shit. Well it really doesnt appeal to me.

    This ad seems to be geared towards women, comfy but sexy undies that you wont be embarrassed to show your dude/lady when you want to get some lovin’.

    • What are you talking about O___O
      I looove Victoria’s Secret. And in no fucking way I would wear that Yes underwear. It looks more like teenage girls’ underwear (and I think it is the target audience) and not for women

      • YES seems like an introduction to sexy underwear. PG sexy, while Victoria Secret is rated R sexy….and the stuff No_Min where is NC-17 sexy

        • I have discovered comfortable underwear for myself last year. It’s like a whole new world has opened, where my vagina and crack feel like they’re in cotton candy wonderland.

          So: fuck sexy underwear if you don’t have plans to show them! Release the granny underwear kraken!

          • I never seen the point of women buying sexy underwear. You spend hundreds of dollars on something that will be worn for 5-10 minutes max

          • You guys say it like only two type of underwear exist – sexy v-strings and ugly granny panties. It can be comfortable and sexy at the same time, imo. Not the best example, but something like that: http://st.ba3.ru/large/V340677.jpg

          • @Boo: I’ve never spent that much money on a set of underwear lol. There are good stores that sell very nice and cheap underwear (for example: fucking New Yorker and H&M were my places to go for underwear for the longest time).

            @Dee: I know. Why won’t you let me exaggerate :o I like how the underwear that you posted looks but I usually had those with lace and that shit feels like someone’s caressing your asshole with sandpaper.

          • better example: http://data.whicdn.com/images/28553232/ass-black-butt-kitchen-lace-Favim.com-414962_large.jpg
            you can wear something like that everyday, it’s comfortable and not embarrassing to show

          • @Dee: Sexy underwear that isn’t meant to be shown is a waste. Also those laces panties seems like they’ll irritate the crap out of your butt crack and leave a rash

            @Min: I never knew there were budget sexy underwear. Then I wonder why Walmart doesn’t sell any

          • @Boo I wear panties like those most of the time and my butt and butt crack are mighty fine, lol
            And why is it a waste? You just feel better wearing it, no matter if you show it or not

          • @Dee: YES to everything you said, ‘cheekies’ FTW. Lace never scratches, and I basically never wear other cuts.
            Besides, nice underwear brings confidence.

          • @Tap: So whenever I see a girl who isn’t sure of herself, I know its because she doesn’t have on the right panties lol

    • How do they make money off appealing to men? I’ll look at their models but I’ve never bought anything associated with VS.

      • Women want to look sexy in underwear for their men so they most likely will buy something that the guys like.

        G-strings are not bought by women cause they are comfy or because chicks stand in front of the mirror and want to masturbate to the sight (although I would if I looked like Adriana Lima).

      • The most annoying word in marketing is “aspirational”. VS uses an aspirational marketing strategy along the lines of “if men want to fuck our models, women will want to be like our models.” And then women will proceed to buy overpriced VS crap because VS has created this “sex goddess” image that women see men drooling over.

        • I don’t see a problem with it. The whole fashion market works like this (and not only fashion), so whatever. And VS is quite cheap by the way.

        • Well it’s not their fault if people are idiots.

          I don’t want to see Roseanne Barr in their shit. Just the models.

          :o

  18. I don’t believe any girls in this article wear sexy underwear. They wear tighty whities just like me

    Pics or it didn’t happen :straight face:

Scroll To Top